@article{oai:redcross.repo.nii.ac.jp:00013661,
 author = {Koichi, Yamashita},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {高知赤十字病院医学雑誌, Medical Journal of Kochi Red Cross Hospital},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {Study Objective
To compare the stroke volume variation (SVV) derived from VigileoTMFlotrac system with the
pulse pressure variation (PPV) under different ventilator settings.
Design
Prospective measurement study
Setting
Operating room in the university hospital
Patients
12 patients (ASA physical status 1-2) who underwent elective surgery
Methods
Simultaneous readings of SVV from VigileoTMFlotrac system and PPV while gradually increasing
and then decreasing positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) from 0 to 15 cm H2O in 5 cm H2O
increments.
Main Results
SVV significantly increased with PEEP >10 cm H2O, being variously 6% ± 2% (PEEP = 0 cm H2O),
8% ± 2% (PEEP = 5 cm H2O), 11% ± 6% (PEEP = 10 cm H2O), 17% ± 10% (PEEP = 15 cm H2O),
11% ± 8% (PEEP = 10 cm H2O), 7% ± 3% (PEEP = 5 cm H2O), and 6% ± 1% (PEEP = 0 cm H2O).
PPV values significantly increased at a PEEP of 15 cm H2O, being variously 7% ± 4% (PEEP = 0
cm H2O), 8% ± 4% (PEEP = 5 cm H2O), 10% ± 4% (PEEP = 10 cm H2O), 13% ± 5% (PEEP = 15
cm H2O), 10% ± 4% (PEEP = 10 cm H2O), 7% ± 4% (PEEP = 5 cm H2O), and 6% ± 3% (PEEP = 0
cm H2O).
Conclusions
SVV derived from VigileoTMFlotrac system was significantly increased under a PEEP of 10 and 15
cm H2O, although PPV values were not significantly affected at a PEEP of 10 cm H2O and below.
Hence, SVV derived from VigileoTMFlotrac system might overestimate fluid responsiveness under
PEEP > 10 cm H2O.},
 pages = {71--75},
 title = {Effects of respiratory settings on stroke volume variation derived from the Vigileo Flotrac system: comparison with pulse pressure variation(和訳中)},
 volume = {22},
 year = {2018}
}